China tightens control on Internet
Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 11:38 pm |
china news |
From the CNN website...
SHANGHAI/BEIJING, China (Reuters) -- New Chinese regulations governing Internet news content tighten the noose on freewheeling bloggers and aim to rein in the medium that is a growing source of information for the mainland's more than 100 million users.
Analysts say the rules issued by the Ministry of Information Industry on Sunday will not change much for authorized, licensed news outlets -- already under the thumb of state control -- but will extend controls to blogs and Internet-only news sites.
"For current media outlets, this is nothing more than a restating of the rules," said David Wolf, who heads Wolf Group Asia, a Beijing-based media and technology consultancy.
"This is aimed at bloggers and other individual and ad hoc journalists that are out there and that don't have a licensed organization."
The regulations target sites that publish fabricated information or pornography and forbid content that "harms national security, reveals state secrets, subverts political power (and) undermines national unity."
They also ban posts that "instigate illegal gatherings, formation of associations, marches, demonstrations, or disturb social order," indicating a lesson learned from anti-Japanese protests that swept China last April and which spread in part due to postings on Internet bulletin boards and chat rooms.
China routinely blocks access to Internet sites on sensitive subjects such as self-ruled Taiwan, which China regards as its own, and the 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy demonstrations which were crushed by the military with heavy loss of life.
Providers of online news and other services, from domestic players Sina Corp. and Sohu.com to international firms such as Yahoo Inc., also practice forms of self-censorship by blocking sites and prohibiting message posting on sensitive topics.
But the new regulations would curtail discussion on a wider variety of subjects, analysts said.
"Much more relevant is current affairs, social and political news. You don't necessarily have to touch taboo areas," said Xiao Qiang, director of the China Internet Project at the University of California at Berkeley.
The rules also widen a campaign to step up control over the Internet that includes forcing bloggers and chat-room participants to use their real names and restricting university on-line discussion groups to students.
"Online is a new form of media. It's grown rapidly in the last five to 10 years, whereas print and broadcasting are easier to regulate," said Vivek Couto of Media Partners Asia.
China has directed another campaign at foreign media, which were taking advantage of newly relaxed laws to set up de facto television channels and production houses.
In that crackdown, China's broadcasting regulator banned the entry of new foreign-invested TV channels into the market and limited foreign media companies to one joint venture apiece in the TV program-making sector.
Analysts said the next few months should see an extension of regulations to mobile phone media, such as text messages, and a few public examples intended to create a climate of self-censorship on the Internet.
But despite the long reach of the state, some said regulating Internet content might prove impossible.
"Those kind of regulations can intimidate and control some sites, but it's just fundamentally against the way information flows on the Internet," Xiao said.
"In the long run, they are still fighting a losing battle."
Analysts say the rules issued by the Ministry of Information Industry on Sunday will not change much for authorized, licensed news outlets -- already under the thumb of state control -- but will extend controls to blogs and Internet-only news sites.
"For current media outlets, this is nothing more than a restating of the rules," said David Wolf, who heads Wolf Group Asia, a Beijing-based media and technology consultancy.
"This is aimed at bloggers and other individual and ad hoc journalists that are out there and that don't have a licensed organization."
The regulations target sites that publish fabricated information or pornography and forbid content that "harms national security, reveals state secrets, subverts political power (and) undermines national unity."
They also ban posts that "instigate illegal gatherings, formation of associations, marches, demonstrations, or disturb social order," indicating a lesson learned from anti-Japanese protests that swept China last April and which spread in part due to postings on Internet bulletin boards and chat rooms.
China routinely blocks access to Internet sites on sensitive subjects such as self-ruled Taiwan, which China regards as its own, and the 1989 Tiananmen Square pro-democracy demonstrations which were crushed by the military with heavy loss of life.
Providers of online news and other services, from domestic players Sina Corp. and Sohu.com to international firms such as Yahoo Inc., also practice forms of self-censorship by blocking sites and prohibiting message posting on sensitive topics.
But the new regulations would curtail discussion on a wider variety of subjects, analysts said.
"Much more relevant is current affairs, social and political news. You don't necessarily have to touch taboo areas," said Xiao Qiang, director of the China Internet Project at the University of California at Berkeley.
The rules also widen a campaign to step up control over the Internet that includes forcing bloggers and chat-room participants to use their real names and restricting university on-line discussion groups to students.
"Online is a new form of media. It's grown rapidly in the last five to 10 years, whereas print and broadcasting are easier to regulate," said Vivek Couto of Media Partners Asia.
China has directed another campaign at foreign media, which were taking advantage of newly relaxed laws to set up de facto television channels and production houses.
In that crackdown, China's broadcasting regulator banned the entry of new foreign-invested TV channels into the market and limited foreign media companies to one joint venture apiece in the TV program-making sector.
Analysts said the next few months should see an extension of regulations to mobile phone media, such as text messages, and a few public examples intended to create a climate of self-censorship on the Internet.
But despite the long reach of the state, some said regulating Internet content might prove impossible.
"Those kind of regulations can intimidate and control some sites, but it's just fundamentally against the way information flows on the Internet," Xiao said.
"In the long run, they are still fighting a losing battle."
Close the curtain...
